|
GRAVITY TWENTY FIVE -- Sunday, October 11, 1992
Just watched the debate, and heard Ross Perot for the first time.
I'm not sure he could pull off what he's promising, but one thing
is clear. He doesn't sound like a politician. He steered clear of
well-rehearsed rhetoric.
This isn't a forum for politics. But there's a lesson here, one
that's
important for our discussion. People's eyes glaze over when they
hear
the same old well-washed jargon, whether it's politics or computers.
If I hear 'user friendly' one more time, I'm going to smack someone.
I
wish I could obliterate the phrase 'computer literacy'. I mean,
come on. While we're at it, let's become advocates for VCR literacy.
Get people to set their clocks and record on seperate stations.
A vital living skill.
LET'S STOP TALKING OURSELVES INTO A RUT.
I read plenty of industry trades, and sometimes I could just scream.
So
much posturing, and so much hype about incremental advances. There's
merit to the real advances, the ones happening in academic environments,
but the industry itself really disappoints me. People talk about
the computer revolution, and use computer technology again and again
as an example of a fast-growth industry, but where really
is this growth?
What's changed in the last ten years? We now have 'desktop publishing',
which is quite something. The buzzword is unfortunate (I won't even
start), but the essence of it is a good thing. 'Multi-media' and
'computer-aided education' are becoming a reality (finally).
But what else? Other than switching to a graphical user environment,
what has happened in the software industry in the last ten years?
Bulletin boards, CompuServe, and other on-line services have regressed.
Prodigy was a joke (though it may have gotten better since I used
it two years ago). People aren't using these resources as much as
they might because the software that runs them is ... old news.
Either too confusing, or too simplified to be really useful. The
one that comes close is Bix. If you've never used Bix, you should
try it. It's also the cheapest.
Again, why am I telling you this? Because it's my disatisfaction
with
the software industry's stagnant state that drives me to design
Gravity.
I look at all the trends, I look at all the hype, I look at new
and old
design ideas, and I say: Look Farther.
Let's get something going that excites people. That challenges
the
not-yet-very-old software scene. That takes in the good stuff and
chucks out the lame stuff. That's got the beauty of a time-tested
mathematical formula, and the poetic appeal of a well-turned phrase.
I've barely begun to describe my efforts, and quickly admit that
my
designs need work. But more than anything... understand my
intent.
Great things are possible!
This industry is brand new. I can't think of a job that has more
potential to change the way people live than software development.
It's brand new. We're just now beginning to explore what we can
do with these machines, and unless we stop talking the same old
way about our incremental advances and take the step outside into
something really new, we'll lose our audience.
People get tired of typical talk. You want a revolution? Stop talking
about computer literacy. Instead create software that's more appealing,
and write clear honest inspiring instructions for it. Without
buzzwords.
|